歐洲質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因安全令農(nóng)業(yè)部恐慌,官網(wǎng)造謠細(xì)節(jié)被公開(kāi)!

歐洲質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因安全令農(nóng)業(yè)部恐慌,官網(wǎng)造謠細(xì)節(jié)被公開(kāi)!

核心提示：2012年3月10，農(nóng)業(yè)部下屬的中國(guó)農(nóng)科院生物所官方網(wǎng)站發(fā)表了否認(rèn)轉(zhuǎn)基因危害的文章：《歐洲研究機(jī)構(gòu)質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因作物安全性的所謂事件真相》，文章采用掩人耳目的欺騙性造謠方式，對(duì)中國(guó)商務(wù)部如實(shí)報(bào)道歐洲質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因安全性事件進(jìn)行肆意歪曲，并對(duì)反轉(zhuǎn)基因的正義呼聲進(jìn)行惡劣攻擊，聲稱(chēng)這是一場(chǎng)虛假報(bào)道、是鬧劇！不過(guò)賊喊作賊的農(nóng)業(yè)部其掘劣的造謠伎倆很快被懂行的人士識(shí)破，其造謠細(xì)節(jié)被一一公開(kāi)!這真是：機(jī)關(guān)算盡太聰明，反誤了卿卿性命！

商業(yè)部門(mén)講真話(huà)，農(nóng)業(yè)部門(mén)搞造謠。

本文同時(shí)發(fā)至不良信息舉報(bào)中心、新聞管理署、商業(yè)部、監(jiān)察部。

直言了，2012-03-09 | 2012-03-11 11:23:46 。

http://zhiyanle.blog.hexun.com/73606810_d.html 。

中國(guó)商業(yè)部發(fā)表了中國(guó)駐歐盟使團(tuán)的新聞布告《歐洲研究機(jī)構(gòu)質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的安全性》（2012-03-09 00:28），全文如下：

歐洲研究機(jī)構(gòu)質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的安全性 。

2012-03-09 00:28 文章來(lái)源：歐盟經(jīng)商處 。

連接：http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/i/jyjl/m/201203/20120308005013.html 。

內(nèi)容::據(jù)《歐洲動(dòng)態(tài)》近期報(bào)道，總部位于慕尼黑的德國(guó)研究機(jī)構(gòu)Testbiotech稱(chēng)，有證據(jù)表明轉(zhuǎn)基因玉米MON810產(chǎn)生的毒素，可以通過(guò)污染土壤、水或動(dòng)物飼料對(duì)人類(lèi)健康產(chǎn)生危害。與該研究機(jī)構(gòu)觀點(diǎn)相似，法國(guó)卡昂大學(xué)2月17日發(fā)表的研究也顯示，有殺蟲(chóng)劑基因的玉米和其他類(lèi)似轉(zhuǎn)基因作物，對(duì)人類(lèi)健康構(gòu)成潛在的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。盡管這些結(jié)果不是結(jié)論性的并且主要基于對(duì)高濃度毒素的研究，但德、法研究人員認(rèn)為，該結(jié)果令人驚訝，而這些風(fēng)險(xiǎn)在以往對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的評(píng)估中被忽略。研究人員稱(chēng)，研究仍需進(jìn)一步評(píng)估，現(xiàn)在就轉(zhuǎn)基因作物對(duì)人類(lèi)健康影響做出結(jié)論為時(shí)尚早。（王凱園） （首發(fā)子站：駐歐盟使團(tuán)經(jīng)商參處子站）

報(bào)道首發(fā)：歐洲研究機(jī)構(gòu)質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因作物的安全性 。

首發(fā)日期：2012-03-09 00:28 文章來(lái)源：歐盟經(jīng)商處 。

首發(fā)連接：http://eu.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/jmxw/201203/20120308005013.html 。

商業(yè)部和中國(guó)駐歐盟使團(tuán)的那篇報(bào)道完全屬實(shí)，講的是真話(huà)。然而，那種消息是不利于轉(zhuǎn)基因既得利益集團(tuán)的推銷(xiāo)和金錢(qián)利益的。于是，為維護(hù)既得利益，轉(zhuǎn)基因既得利益集團(tuán)的槍手之一即農(nóng)業(yè)部農(nóng)科院生技所林敏那里又發(fā)表他的輿論伙伴方舟子式的造謠誹謗，用他們編造的謊言、在農(nóng)業(yè)部門(mén)官方網(wǎng)媒上發(fā)文對(duì)中國(guó)商業(yè)部和外交機(jī)構(gòu)的實(shí)事求是的報(bào)道搞惡毒攻擊。下面簡(jiǎn)單說(shuō)來(lái)。

林敏機(jī)構(gòu)造謠說(shuō)：要想揭開(kāi)事件的真相，首先要看看那個(gè)總部位于慕尼黑的德國(guó)研究機(jī)構(gòu)Testbiotech是個(gè)什么樣的機(jī)構(gòu)。登錄德國(guó)Testbiotech的官方網(wǎng)站一查，原來(lái)是一個(gè)非[正文]府組織，更令筆者吃驚的是，該機(jī)構(gòu)不是什么研究機(jī)構(gòu)，根本沒(méi)有直接對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因玉米MON810進(jìn)行什么研究，而只是于2012年2月17日在其網(wǎng)站上援引了法國(guó)卡昂大學(xué)的相關(guān)研究結(jié)果而已。（摘錄完）。

事實(shí)：林敏機(jī)構(gòu)那說(shuō)法是自欺欺人和自打耳光。

孟山都公司和杜邦先鋒良種等轉(zhuǎn)基因公司都是非官方機(jī)構(gòu)，林敏機(jī)構(gòu)和農(nóng)業(yè)部門(mén)官員為什么那么崇拜它們呢？林敏機(jī)構(gòu)那說(shuō)法，不是自打耳光嗎？

順便問(wèn)問(wèn)林敏：您跟方舟子一道出現(xiàn)在社會(huì)舞臺(tái)，為推銷(xiāo)轉(zhuǎn)基因的商業(yè)利益而散布了許多謠言和虛假信息。如此，方舟子是‘官方科研機(jī)構(gòu)’嗎？他不過(guò)是個(gè)身份造假、靠抄襲剽竊和造謠誹謗過(guò)日子的無(wú)業(yè)人員。既然您和您的機(jī)構(gòu)那么看不起“非官方機(jī)構(gòu)”，那您跟方舟子混做一團(tuán)，算是什么事呢？您的言論不是自欺欺人和自打耳光嗎？

再有，所說(shuō)該科研項(xiàng)目是德法兩國(guó)科研機(jī)構(gòu)分工協(xié)作搞的、科研報(bào)告經(jīng)過(guò)同行評(píng)議，而并非是林敏機(jī)構(gòu)造謠所說(shuō)的“德國(guó)機(jī)構(gòu)援引法國(guó)機(jī)構(gòu)”。相關(guān)原文：

Genetically engineered maize: New indication of health risks Bt protein toxic to human cells

17 February 2012, Caen/ Munich 。

連接：http://www.testbiotech.de/en/node/620 。

The research was supported by GEKKO foundation (Germany). CRIIGEN Association (France) and Testbiotech (Germany) were involved in planning the experiments and the discussion of results. Findings were published after peer review process.

該類(lèi)科研結(jié)果已有許多主要媒體報(bào)道，而且，美國(guó)衛(wèi)生部還轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)過(guò)，見(jiàn)：

A Comparison of the Effects of Three GM Corn Varieties on Mammalian Health

Jo?l Spiroux de Vend?mois,1 Fran?ois Roullier,1 Dominique Cellier,1,2 and Gilles-Eric Séralini1,3

1. CRIIGEN, 40 rue Monceau, 75008 Paris, France

2. University of Rouen LITIS EA 4108, 76821 Mont-Saint-Aignan, France

3. University of Caen, Institute of Biology, Risk Pole CNRS, EA 2608, 14032 Caen, France

Conflict of Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Received July 23, 2009; Accepted November 17, 2009.

連接：http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2793308/。

對(duì)比事實(shí)看，很清楚，林敏機(jī)構(gòu)搞了十分低劣的造謠和撒謊。

林敏機(jī)構(gòu)還說(shuō)：歐洲權(quán)威機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)基因玉米MON810的安全性是否進(jìn)行了評(píng)估？筆者查詢(xún)歐盟食品安全局官方網(wǎng)站，有了重要發(fā)現(xiàn)。實(shí)際上，轉(zhuǎn)基因玉米MON810的安全性已經(jīng)通過(guò)了歐盟食品安全局（EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)和法國(guó)食品安全局AFSAA/ANSES (French Food Safety Authority)的安全性評(píng)估，……歐洲食品安全管理局轉(zhuǎn)基因生物安全專(zhuān)家組評(píng)估報(bào)告的原文鏈接http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1149.htm 。

事實(shí)：林敏機(jī)構(gòu)所謂的歐盟評(píng)估是2009年07月的，已過(guò)時(shí)作廢，即歐盟已做了替換，見(jiàn)：

EU: Scientific Opinion。

on the annual Post-Market Environmental Monitoring(PMEM) report from Monsanto Europe S.A. on the cultivation of genetically modified maize MON810 in 2009 。

EFSA Journal 2011;9(10):2376 [66 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2376 。

Adopted: 07 September 2011 。

Published: 25 October 2011 。

Last updated: 13 January 2012. This version replaces the previous one/s.

連接：http://www.efsa.europa.eu/de/efsajournal/pub/2376.htm 。

內(nèi)容：From the data submitted by the applicant in its 2009 MON810 report, the EFSA GMO Panel did not identify adverse effects on the environment, human and animal health due to maize MON810 cultivation during the 2009 growing season. The outcomes of the 2009 MON810 report do not invalidate the previous risk assessment conclusions on maize MON810.

However, the EFSA GMO Panel notes a number of shortcomings in the methodology for CSM and GS. Hence, this scientific opinion gives specific recommendations for improvement of the strategy, methodology and reporting for the post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of maize MON810. The applicant should take into account the guidance on Post-Market Environmental Monitoring of genetically modified plants as outlined in the recent scientific opinion of the EFSA GMO Panel. The recommendations of the EFSA GMO Panel in this opinion supplement the previous recommendations on PMEM of maize MON810 in the 2009 scientific opinion for the renewal of the authorisation for continued marketing of maize MON810.

歐盟這科學(xué)評(píng)估報(bào)告說(shuō)的很清楚：此2011年底完成和2012年發(fā)表的評(píng)估替換2009年的評(píng)估；2009年評(píng)估是基于孟山都公司而做的；風(fēng)險(xiǎn)方面的結(jié)論不變（即該轉(zhuǎn)基因作物有危害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，因而必須采取風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理措施）；但是，評(píng)估看到其報(bào)告方法缺陷，要求孟山都就銷(xiāo)售后的環(huán)境保護(hù)方面做出完整申請(qǐng)，以便歐盟對(duì)MON810做出授權(quán)到期后的重新審核。

其實(shí)，歐美媒體早有報(bào)道說(shuō)明，歐盟該評(píng)估機(jī)構(gòu)的一些人員原本是孟山都公司的人員、有嚴(yán)重利益沖突，其評(píng)估是基于孟山都公司報(bào)告而不是基于獨(dú)立科學(xué)研究機(jī)構(gòu)的，因而極缺可靠可信度。這種公信力損害，也是歐盟總部不得不只做授權(quán)、而把是否批準(zhǔn)轉(zhuǎn)基因作物商業(yè)化種植上市的決定權(quán)放給各成員國(guó)自己掌握的主要緣故之一。當(dāng)然，歐盟這評(píng)估替換，也是治理利益沖突和尊重獨(dú)立科研的結(jié)果。

這份替換評(píng)估，還有歐盟國(guó)家關(guān)于嚴(yán)格限制甚至禁止轉(zhuǎn)基因飼料喂養(yǎng)的蜜蜂之蜂蜜進(jìn)入食品市場(chǎng)的規(guī)定、以及要求孟山都公司就轉(zhuǎn)基因作物花粉傳播造成生態(tài)污染和生態(tài)破壞的問(wèn)題提出防治報(bào)告，等等，也是迫使巴斯夫和孟山都于今年年初先后宣布撤出歐盟轉(zhuǎn)基因食品作物市場(chǎng)、標(biāo)志著轉(zhuǎn)基因食品作物在歐盟國(guó)的終結(jié)（歐美媒體之評(píng)價(jià)）的主要緣故之一。

如此結(jié)果不奇怪：孟山都公司要想拿自己的轉(zhuǎn)基因作物打入歐盟食品市場(chǎng)，就得按要求拿出危害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析及如何防治的報(bào)告，否則就別想了。可是，該公司拿不出那個(gè)報(bào)告：BT轉(zhuǎn)基因作物開(kāi)始商業(yè)化之際，美國(guó)官方就明確說(shuō)明那東西含有毒素毒害，所以法規(guī)規(guī)定種植該類(lèi)作物必須采取“避難所”措施；在美國(guó)，已有官方報(bào)告說(shuō)明轉(zhuǎn)基因作物農(nóng)業(yè)區(qū)出現(xiàn)了水系空氣的規(guī)模污染，轉(zhuǎn)基因食品作物可傷害動(dòng)物內(nèi)臟，而且，轉(zhuǎn)基因作物商業(yè)化帶來(lái)“超級(jí)害蟲(chóng)”和“超級(jí)雜草”已經(jīng)成為威脅美國(guó)國(guó)土安全的重大問(wèn)題、國(guó)會(huì)已經(jīng)召開(kāi)過(guò)聽(tīng)政會(huì)、要求主管部門(mén)和相關(guān)企業(yè)拿出治理方案，至今未果。如此，孟山都等根本拿不出報(bào)告，不撤也得撤了。

事實(shí)證明，林敏機(jī)構(gòu)是為金錢(qián)利益而故意用過(guò)時(shí)作廢的東西搞散布虛假信息和搞造謠誹謗活動(dòng)。

林敏機(jī)構(gòu)造謠說(shuō)：筆者首先感到疑慮的是，為什么這樣大的事情在歐洲的主流媒體沒(méi)有任何報(bào)道，太不正常了。（摘錄完）。

事實(shí)：如前說(shuō)，美國(guó)衛(wèi)生部轉(zhuǎn)發(fā)過(guò)相關(guān)科研報(bào)告，該故事早已遍布?xì)W美媒體。就最近事態(tài)而言，在谷歌做查詢(xún)，有60,000多個(gè)媒體發(fā)表或轉(zhuǎn)載了相關(guān)新聞報(bào)道：

把自己不懂的東西叫“偽科學(xué)”、把自己不知道的事情出現(xiàn)叫“騙局”，然后對(duì)別人搞無(wú)端指控和惡毒攻擊，那是靠抄襲剽竊和造謠誹謗吃飯的無(wú)業(yè)方舟子及其團(tuán)伙的行為模式。農(nóng)業(yè)官員林敏跟造假吃飯無(wú)業(yè)人員方舟子一道，肩并肩地出現(xiàn)在社會(huì)舞臺(tái)，為推銷(xiāo)轉(zhuǎn)基因編造散布了許多謊言。如今，林敏機(jī)構(gòu)再操方舟子行為模式，對(duì)商業(yè)部和外交部門(mén)的實(shí)事求是的報(bào)道搞造謠誹謗活動(dòng)，那一點(diǎn)不奇怪。令人感到納悶和難以接受的是，林敏是有公職公權(quán)的官員，居然為金錢(qián)利益而跟靠剽竊吃飯的無(wú)業(yè)人員方舟子混作一團(tuán)、多年多次地對(duì)搞撒謊欺騙和欺上瞞下、如今甚至公權(quán)私用、在官媒平臺(tái)用虛假信息對(duì)中國(guó)官方機(jī)構(gòu)實(shí)事求是報(bào)道搞造謠誹謗；對(duì)如此官員公開(kāi)的嚴(yán)重違法亂紀(jì)行為，居然無(wú)人過(guò)問(wèn)、也沒(méi)個(gè)依法懲治。

最后，這里感謝中國(guó)商業(yè)部和外交部做實(shí)事求是報(bào)道的官員：中國(guó)社會(huì)，轉(zhuǎn)基因神話(huà)假話(huà)滿(mǎn)天了多年，至今利益關(guān)系媒體還在封殺關(guān)于轉(zhuǎn)基因食品作物的危害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的消息。在這種情況下，你們能發(fā)出實(shí)事求是的新聞報(bào)道，幫助中國(guó)民眾社會(huì)和決策機(jī)構(gòu)了解事實(shí)真相，說(shuō)明你們心中有人民安危和國(guó)家利益，說(shuō)明你們是公權(quán)公用為民眾服務(wù)的。就此實(shí)事求是的工作作風(fēng)而言，那些搞轉(zhuǎn)基因神話(huà)假話(huà)的官員及其機(jī)構(gòu)和媒體的為利坑民和為錢(qián)騙人的品質(zhì)之惡劣，那是根本無(wú)法相比的。

附：中國(guó)商業(yè)部和外交部門(mén)的實(shí)事求是的報(bào)道：

 

附：歐美媒體一篇相關(guān)報(bào)道的原文。

Study Questions Safety Of GM Corn As France Seeks EU Ban.

Written by: EurActiv, February 25, 2012.

http://www.eurasiareview.com/25022012-study-questions-safety-of-gm-corn-as-france-seeks-eu-ban/

(EurActiv) — Insecticides present in one of Europe’s most controversial genetically modified crops, MON810 maize, may be harmful to humans, French and German researchers say in a new study that could pour fuel over calls asking to limit such plants in the EU.

The study comes as France’s environment and agricultural ministers this week urged the European Commission to seek an EU-wide ban on the cultivation of MON810, EurActiv.fr reported. The maize is outlawed in Austria, Germany, Greece, Hungary and Luxembourg, while France is threatening to re-impose its own ban that was struck down in court if the EU does not act.

Christoph Then, who heads the Testbiotech research firm in Munich, said there is evidence that MON810 produces a toxin that can be harmful to humans through soil, water or animal feed contamination.

The Testbiotech’s study, in conjunction with research done at the University of Caen, shows that insecticides present in genetically engineered maize and similar crops pose a potential risk to humans. The study was released on 17 February.

Although the results are not conclusive and are based on review of high concentrations of toxins, the German-French team of researchers said the finding was a “surprising outcome and this risk was somehow overlooked” in past assessments of biotech crops.

“We don’t know yet the final impact for the human consumer is, it’s too early to say that,” Then said in a telephone interview. “We are very cautious about saying we have proof that the consumer risk is high, that it needs more assessments.”

Monsanto last month announced it would scrap plans to sell the maize in France despite a French court ruling in November that overturned a 2008 government ban on the sale of MON810.

‘Safe as its conventional counterpart’

The US-based seed and herbicide company has long maintained that MON810 and other genetically modified crops are safe and more environmentally friendly because they produce higher yields, require fewer pesticides and need less water than conventional seeds.

The European Food Safety Authority in 2009 issued an assessment showing that “maize MON810 is as safe as its conventional counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health” and is unlikely to have “any adverse effect on the environment.” A 2004 study by the Parma, Italy-based EU agency reached similar conclusions.

However, the accuracy of EFSA reports on GM crops have been criticised by MEPs, national governments and researchers – including Then’s Testbiotech – for allegedly relying too heavily on industry-based information and research.

Acknowledging that there are divergent views on GM safety, Then called for additional independent research on the use of the Bacillus thuringiensis, or Bt, toxin that is used in GM crops like MON810 to strengthen their resistance to insects.

另附農(nóng)業(yè)部官網(wǎng)造謠文章：

歐洲研究機(jī)構(gòu)質(zhì)疑轉(zhuǎn)基因作物安全性的所謂事件真相

文章鏈接：http://bri.caas.net.cn/news/in_01.aspx?id=809