首頁 > 文章 > 國際 > 國際縱橫

哥本哈根驚曝“西方密約”

武漢晨報 · 2009-12-10 · 來源:烏有之鄉
氣候問題 收藏( 評論() 字體: / /

武漢晨報 2009-12-10      速覽世界      35           

哥本哈根驚曝“西方密約”

據《中國日報》報道 正在丹麥首都哥本哈根舉行的聯合國氣候峰會9日陷入困擾,原因是英國《衛報》披露了一份決議草案,該草案不僅賦予了發達工業國家在未來氣候變化問題談判上更大的話語權,而且還削弱了聯合國在此問題上的應有作用,拋棄了《京都議定書》的減排原則。該草案因此引起了發展中國家的強烈不滿與抵制。

根據英國《衛報》的報道,這份名為“丹麥提案”(Danish Text)的決議草案實際上是一份“西方密約”,因為它是由包括英國、美國和丹麥在內的幾個西方工業發達國家共同起草的。

該草案背棄了《京都議定書》規定的由發達國家帶頭減排、發展中國家毋須強制減排的精神,即“共同但有區別”的原則。根據該草案設定的人均排放標準,發達國家可以比發展中國家多排放一倍的溫室氣體,即從現在起到2050年,發達國家可人均累積排放2.67噸溫室氣體,而發展中國家人均只可累積排放1.44噸。

此外,該草案還將應付氣候變化的融資撥款大權交給了西方國家主導的世界銀行。這樣一來,發達國家便擁有了一項特殊權利——可以根據發展中國家的“實際表現”來決定是否向其提供資金援助。

報道還說,為了實現它們的“如意算盤”,發達國家還決定通過扶持一些所謂的“最脆弱國家”來進一步分化與瓦解發展中國家。

由于這份決議草案明顯是在“劫貧濟富”,草案的內容一經公布立即引發了強烈的不滿。

在進行了閉門磋商以后,七十七國集團輪值主席、蘇丹常駐聯合國副代表迪亞平8日19點(北京時間9日凌晨2點)召開新聞發布會,表示堅決反對該草案中的內容。“我們不能承受談判破裂的危險,但是,我們不會簽署不平等的協議,我們也不能讓世界上80%的人口繼續承受苦難與不公正待遇。”

在被問及此事時,中國代表團副團長、發改委氣候司司長蘇偉表示,中國還沒有看到這份草案因此無法表態,但是中國絕不接受對發展中國家不利的決議。

鏈接  中國碳排放峰值年份:2030~2040

科技部部長萬鋼7日表示,中國溫室氣體排放將在2030年至2040年間達到頂峰,他希望中國能在此時間范圍內盡可能早地達到峰值。這也是中國部長級官員首次公開預估中國碳排放的峰值年份。丹麥此前提出的一份大會草案要將全球排放峰值年定為2025年,遭到以中國、印度為首的發展中國家強烈反對。

Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak

Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol

Read the 'Danish text'
In pictures: Copenhagen day two

COP15: A Haitian delegation during second-day session at the Bella center in Copenhagen

A Haitian delegation rests before the second-day session begins in Copenhagen. Photograph: Attila Kisbenedek/AFP/Getty Images

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.

The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as "the circle of commitment" – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.

The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as "a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks".

A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:

• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called "the most vulnerable";

• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.

Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.

"It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get [Barack] Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process," said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.

Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: "This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed."

Hill continued: "It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN. That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks."

The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.

Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.

「 支持烏有之鄉!」

烏有之鄉 WYZXWK.COM

您的打賞將用于網站日常運行與維護。
幫助我們辦好網站,宣傳紅色文化!

注:配圖來自網絡無版權標志圖像,侵刪!
聲明:文章僅代表作者個人觀點,不代表本站觀點——烏有之鄉 責任編輯:heji

歡迎掃描下方二維碼,訂閱烏有之鄉網刊微信公眾號

收藏

心情表態

今日頭條

點擊排行

  • 兩日熱點
  • 一周熱點
  • 一月熱點
  • 心情
  1. 反抗吧,我的人民,反抗吧
  2. 再說掩耳盜鈴
  3. 評上海富二代用豪車揚我國威:豪車統治著富人和窮人
  4. 彭勝玉:公安部定性電詐存在嚴重問題,本質是恐怖組織有組織綁架販賣囚禁中國人口,強烈建議移交中國軍方解決
  5. 湖北石鋒|讓“個人崇拜"論見鬼去吧!
  6. 吃飽了才會有道德嗎?
  7. 為什么總有人把毛主席放在后四十年的對立面?
  8. 毛主席,為什么反不得?
  9. 劉繼明|隨想錄(20)
  10. 簡評蘇俄知識分子的厄運
  1. 孔慶東|做毛主席的好戰士,敢于戰斗,善于戰斗——紀念毛主席誕辰131年韶山講話
  2. “深水區”背后的階級較量,撕裂利益集團!
  3. 大蕭條的時代特征:歷史在重演
  4. 央媒的反腐片的確“驚艷”,可有誰想看續集?
  5. 瘋狂從老百姓口袋里掏錢,發現的時候已經怨聲載道了!
  6. 到底誰“封建”?
  7. 張勤德|廣大民眾在“總危機爆發期”的新覺醒 ——試答多位好友尖銳和有價值的提問
  8. 兩個草包經濟學家:向松祚、許小年
  9. 該來的還是來了,潤美殖人被遣返,資產被沒收,美吹群秒變美帝批判大會
  10. 掩耳盜鈴及其他
  1. 北京景山紅歌會隆重紀念毛主席逝世48周年
  2. 元龍:不換思想就換人?貪官頻出亂乾坤!
  3. 遼寧王忠新:必須直面“先富論”的“十大痛點”
  4. 劉教授的問題在哪
  5. 季羨林到底是什么樣的人
  6. 十一屆三中全會公報認為“顛倒歷史”的“右傾翻案風”,是否存在?
  7. 歷數阿薩德罪狀,觸目驚心!
  8. 陳中華:如果全面私有化,就沒革命的必要
  9. 我們還等什么?
  10. 只有李先念有理由有資格這樣發問!
  1. 車間主任焦裕祿
  2. 地圖未開疆,后院先失火
  3. 孔慶東|做毛主席的好戰士,敢于戰斗,善于戰斗——紀念毛主席誕辰131年韶山講話
  4. 孔慶東|做毛主席的好戰士,敢于戰斗,善于戰斗——紀念毛主席誕辰131年韶山講話
  5. 何滌宙:一位長征功臣的歷史湮沒之謎
  6. 央媒的反腐片的確“驚艷”,可有誰想看續集?
亚洲Av一级在线播放,欧美三级黄色片不卡在线播放,日韩乱码人妻无码中文,国产精品一级二级三级
亚洲无遮挡一级精品视频 | 在线亚洲精品国产二区欧美 | 色综久久综合桃花网 | 日韩亚洲专区中文字幕 | 亚洲免费人成影院在线播放 | 日韩、欧美一区 |