近日，北京二中院開庭審理央視大火案的21名被告，包括一位農(nóng)民。庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)的電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”是央視大火（不是點(diǎn)火，而是為何放焰火的火星在短時(shí)間形成電視文化中心“天燈”般如此猛烈大火）的罪魁禍?zhǔn)祝瑸槭裁床蛔肪浚俊 ?/p>
庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)“概念設(shè)計(jì)”是央視大火的罪魁禍?zhǔn)?
The “chimney” structure “Concept Design” proposed by Rem Koolhaas is the chief criminal for the “CCTV fire”!
陳一文顧問（[email protected]）
Advisor Chen I-wan（[email protected]）
近日，北京二中院開庭審理央視大火案的21名被告，包括一位農(nóng)民。
During recent days, the Beijing No.2 Intermediate Court is holding hearings on the CCTV (TVCC) fire case with 21 defendants, including one farmer.
圖1、從放焰火到著火
圖2、從著火到劇烈“天燈”般大火
庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)的電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”是央視大火的“罪魁禍?zhǔn)住薄 ?/p>
The “chimney” structure “Concept Design” proposed by Rem Koolhaas for the TVCC is the “chief criminal” for the “CCTV fire”
認(rèn)真關(guān)注該項(xiàng)審理的有關(guān)情況與進(jìn)展，作為從2008年6月開始關(guān)注、調(diào)查研究、編寫《央視新樓是“世界第一危樓”》防災(zāi)報(bào)告的筆者不得不負(fù)責(zé)任地指出：
Paying careful attention to the hearings and proceedings, as the writer of the disaster prevention report “The new CCTV tower is the “World’s No.1 Dangerous Building””, who began to pay attention, investigated the issue and write the report in June 2008, Advisor Chen I-wan must responsibly point out:
圖3、陳一文顧問 庫哈斯在他“應(yīng)當(dāng)?shù)奈恢蒙稀薄 ?/p>
Advisor Chen I-wan Rem Koolhaas in “the position he should be”
庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)的電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”是央視大火（不是點(diǎn)火，而是為何放焰火的火星在短時(shí)間形成電視文化中心“天燈”般如此猛烈大火）的罪魁禍?zhǔn)祝浯问窃陔娨曃幕行闹羞`法大量使用可燃“保溫板”責(zé)任人。
The “chimney” structure “Concept Design” proposed by Rem Koolhaas for the TVCC is the chief criminal for the “CCTV fire” (not for starting the fire, but why the fire work sparks within such a short duration caused the TVCC to burn so intensively like a sky torch), thereafter is the person responsible for illegally using massive amount of burnable “insulation pads” on the TVCC building.
圖4、庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)的電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”
The “chimney” structure “Concept Design” proposed by Rem Koolhaas
筆者《央視新樓是“世界第一危樓”》防災(zāi)報(bào)告依據(jù)十五：明顯違反《高層民用建筑設(shè)計(jì)防火規(guī)范》！（上）對上述問題進(jìn)行了論證。
The writer’s “The new CCTV tower is the “World’s No.1 Dangerous Building” disaster prevention report ”Reason 15: Apparent violation to “High rise civil building design fire protection code” （1）clearly explains this issue.
為什么不追究庫哈斯“拔火筒”結(jié)構(gòu)的電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”責(zé)任？電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”評委會(huì)及其負(fù)責(zé)人的責(zé)任？電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”審查單位的責(zé)任？電視文化中心“概念設(shè)計(jì)”防火性能審查單位的責(zé)任？
Why is the responsibility of the “chimney” structure “Concept Design” proposed by Rem Koolhaas for the TVCC not blamed? What about the responsibility of the “Concept Design” evaluation committee? What about the responsibility of the “Concept Design” examination party and its responsible person? What about the responsibility of the “Concept Design” fire resistant examination party and its responsible person?
The Content of the “ CCTV Tower is World’s No.1 Dangerous Building ” report with links to all the papers (in Chinese) :
http://www.chinavalue.net/Blog/300242.aspx
相關(guān)文章
「 支持烏有之鄉(xiāng)！」
烏有之鄉(xiāng) WYZXWK.COM
您的打賞將用于網(wǎng)站日常運(yùn)行與維護(hù)。
幫助我們辦好網(wǎng)站，宣傳紅色文化！
歡迎掃描下方二維碼，訂閱烏有之鄉(xiāng)網(wǎng)刊微信公眾號
